Ansible troubleshooting - Error 305: command-instead-of-shell
How to Solve the Ansible Error 305 command-instead-of-shell
Ansible, the popular automation tool, provides a powerful platform for managing and configuring IT infrastructure efficiently. While Ansible offers various modules to execute tasks, it’s crucial to choose the right module for specific use cases. Ansible-Lint, a widely-used linting tool for Ansible playbooks, enforces rules to help you follow best practices. In this article, we’ll delve into Rule 305, “
command-instead-of-shell,” which encourages the use of the command module over the shell module when it’s not necessary to employ shell features.
Understanding Rule 305
Rule 305, “
command-instead-of-shell,” is a valuable guideline that promotes efficiency and best practices in Ansible playbooks. It suggests that the command module should be preferred over the shell module unless specific shell features, such as environment variable expansion or chaining multiple commands using pipes, are required.
Let’s explore a piece of problematic code that Rule 305 can identify in your playbooks:
--- - name: Problematic example hosts: all tasks: - name: Echo a message ansible.builtin.shell: echo hello # <-- command is better in this case changed_when: false
In this code snippet, the playbook utilizes the shell module (
ansible.builtin.shell) to execute a simple command that echoes a message. While this code will work, it’s not the most efficient or recommended approach.
WARNING Listing 1 violation(s) that are fatal command-instead-of-shell: Use shell only when shell functionality is required. 305.yml:5 Task/Handler: Echo a message Read documentation for instructions on how to ignore specific rule violations. Rule Violation Summary count tag profile rule associated tags 1 command-instead-of-shell basic command-shell, idiom Failed: 1 failure(s), 0 warning(s) on 1 files. Last profile that met the validation criteria was 'min'.
The Best Resources For Ansible
- CYBER DEALS at The Linux Foundation! Up to 65% off, and a FREE GIFT with EVERY PURCHASE! Limited Time, Don't Delay!
- Udemy: Learn Ansible Automation in 250+examples & practical lessons: Learn Ansible with some real-life examples of how to use the most common modules and Ansible Playbook
- Ansible by Examples: 200+ Automation Examples For Linux and Windows System Administrator and DevOps
- Ansible Cookbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Unleashing the Power of Ansible via Best Practices, Troubleshooting, and Linting Rules with Luca Berton
- Ansible For Windows By Examples: 50+ Automation Examples For Windows System Administrator And DevOps
- Ansible For Linux by Examples: 100+ Automation Examples For Linux System Administrator and DevOps
- Ansible Linux Filesystem By Examples: 40+ Automation Examples on Linux File and Directory Operation for Modern IT Infrastructure
- Ansible For Security by Examples: 100+ Automation Examples to Automate Security and Verify Compliance for IT Modern Infrastructure
- Ansible Tips and Tricks: 10+ Ansible Examples to Save Time and Automate More Tasks
- Ansible Linux Users & Groups By Examples: 20+ Automation Examples on Linux Users and Groups Operation for Modern IT Infrastructure
- Ansible For PostgreSQL by Examples: 10+ Examples To Automate Your PostgreSQL database
- Ansible For Amazon Web Services AWS By Examples: 10+ Examples To Automate Your AWS Modern Infrastructure
- Ansible Automation Platform By Example: A step-by-step guide for the most common user scenarios
The corrected code that adheres to Rule 305 is as follows:
--- - name: Correct example hosts: all tasks: - name: Echo a message ansible.builtin.command: echo hello changed_when: false
In this improved version, the command module (
ansible.builtin.command) is used to execute the same “echo” command. This approach aligns with best practices and is more efficient.
Why Choose the Command Module Over the Shell Module
The command module is preferred over the shell module in many cases due to several advantages:
Efficiency: The command module is considerably faster than the shell module, making your playbooks run more quickly.
Predictability: Using the command module ensures more predictable and reliable execution, as it doesn’t involve shell-specific behavior.
Idempotence: The command module is idempotent by design, meaning it only makes changes when necessary, enhancing playbook reliability.
Security: By avoiding unnecessary shell access, you reduce potential security risks and vulnerabilities.
While Rule 305 encourages the use of the command module, there may be situations where you genuinely need the features offered by the shell module. In such cases, it’s essential to carefully consider whether the use of shell features justifies the performance trade-off. If you find that the shell module is indeed necessary, you can continue using it with an understanding of the potential efficiency implications.
Rule 305, “
command-instead-of-shell,” is a valuable guideline within Ansible-Lint that promotes efficiency and best practices in Ansible playbooks. By choosing the command module over the shell module when shell-specific features are not required, you can enhance the speed, predictability, and reliability of your automation tasks. This practice contributes to a more efficient and secure Ansible workflow, ultimately ensuring that your playbooks perform optimally and effectively manage your IT infrastructure.
Learn the Ansible automation technology with some real-life examples in my
My book Ansible By Examples: 200+ Automation Examples For Linux and Windows System Administrator and DevOps
Want to keep this project going? Please donate