Ansible troubleshooting - Error 202: Risky Octal Permissions

How to Solve the Ansible Error 202: Risky Octal Permissions

October 31, 2023

Access the Complete Video Course and Learn Quick Ansible by 200+ Practical Lessons

#ansible-error #ansible-best-practices #ansible-playbook #ansible-troubleshooting #automation #infrastructure-as-code #ansible-linting #ansible-coding #devops #it-automation

Introduction

Ansible, a powerful automation tool, enables you to manage configurations, deploy software, and automate various tasks in a structured and organized manner. However, to harness the full potential of Ansible, it’s essential to follow best practices and avoid potential pitfalls. In this article, we’ll explore Ansible Error 202, “risky-octal”, which focuses on the use of octal file permissions in your Ansible playbooks. We’ll discuss why using integers or octal values in YAML can lead to unexpected behavior and how to ensure that your file permissions are defined safely and predictably.

The Problem: Risky Octal File Permissions

Ansible Error 202, “risky-octal”, is designed to prevent the use of octal file permissions in a non-standard form, which can result in unpredictable outcomes. Octal file permissions are typically written with a leading zero (e.g., 0644). When you omit the leading zero and use an integer (e.g., 644), the YAML parser interprets the value differently, leading to unexpected results.

Problematic Code Example:

---
- name: Example playbook
  hosts: localhost
  tasks:
    - name: Unsafe example of declaring Numeric file permissions
      ansible.builtin.file:
        path: /etc/foo.conf
        owner: foo
        group: foo
        mode: 644 # <- Risky octal without a leading zero

In the above code snippet, the “mode” parameter lacks the leading zero in the octal permission, making it prone to unpredictable behavior.

Output:

WARNING  Listing 3 violation(s) that are fatal
risky-octal: `mode: 644` should have a string value with leading zero `mode: "01204"` or use symbolic mode.
202.yml:5 Task/Handler: Unsafe example of declaring Numeric file permissions

yaml[new-line-at-end-of-file]: No new line character at the end of file
202.yml:11

yaml[trailing-spaces]: Trailing spaces
202.yml:11

Read documentation for instructions on how to ignore specific rule violations.

                      Rule Violation Summary                      
 count tag                           profile rule associated tags 
     1 yaml[new-line-at-end-of-file] basic   formatting, yaml     
     1 yaml[trailing-spaces]         basic   formatting, yaml     
     1 risky-octal                   safety  formatting           

Failed: 3 failure(s), 0 warning(s) on 1 files. Last profile that met the validation criteria was 'min'.

Modules that are checked

The Best Resources For Ansible

Certifications

The Linux Foundation Linux Performance Tuning - Build a broad toolkit to optimize Linux performance from the kernel up

Coursera Pro - Unlimited access to 7,000+ world-class courses, hands-on projects, and job-ready certificate programs—all included in your subscription

Video Course

Udemy: Learn Ansible Automation in 250+examples & practical lessons: Learn Ansible with some real-life examples of how to use the most common modules and Ansible Playbook

Printed Book

eBooks

Correcting File Permissions

To address Ansible Error 202 and define file permissions safely and predictably, you should use a quoted string with a leading zero when specifying octal permissions. Here’s how to do it correctly:

---
- name: Example playbook
  hosts: localhost
  tasks:
    - name: Safe example of declaring Numeric file permissions (1st solution)
      ansible.builtin.file:
        path: /etc/foo.conf
        owner: foo
        group: foo
        mode: "0644" # <- Quoting and the leading zero will prevent surprises

In the corrected code, we have placed the octal value in double quotes with a leading zero, ensuring that it’s interpreted correctly.

An alternative, equally valid approach is to use a string with a “0o” prefix:

---
- name: Example playbook
  hosts: localhost
  tasks:
    - name: Safe example of declaring Numeric file permissions (2nd solution)
      ansible.builtin.file:
        path: /etc/foo.conf
        owner: foo
        group: foo
        mode: "0o644" # <- Using the "0o" prefix for octal permissions

Benefits of Safe File Permissions

Predictable Behavior: Using a leading zero or the “0o” prefix ensures that the YAML parser correctly interprets octal file permissions, avoiding unexpected outcomes.
Consistency: Safe file permissions contribute to consistent playbook behavior and make your automation more reliable.
Clarity: Quoting octal permissions improves the readability of your code and ensures that your intentions are clear to others who may work on the playbook.
Avoiding Surprises: Ensuring safe file permissions eliminates potential surprises or issues caused by incorrect interpretation.

Conclusion

Ansible Error 202, “risky-octal”, serves as an important reminder to use octal file permissions in a safe and predictable manner. By quoting octal values with a leading zero or using the “0o” prefix, you can ensure that your playbooks run as expected and without any surprises.

In the world of infrastructure automation, predictability and reliability are paramount. Therefore, when working with Ansible, remember to define your file permissions in a manner that avoids unexpected behavior and supports consistent execution of your tasks.

Subscribe to the YouTube channel, Medium, and Website, X (formerly Twitter) to not miss the next episode of the Ansible Pilot.